In another losing season, the Reds should still have a few players in contention for postseason awards. Perhaps Eugenio Suarez’s potential 50-homer season will earn him a few MVP votes. Sonny Gray and Luis Castillo could get some Cy Young love. None of them are likely to win those awards.

However, Gray has a strong chance of winning a less sexy but still notable prize: National League Comeback Player of the Year.

The official criterion for the award is rather vague: “The Comeback Player of the Year Award recognizes the players who have re-emerged on the baseball field during a given season.” It often goes to a player who was injured the previous year. That was the case for the last four NL winners (Matt Harvey, Anthony Rendon, Greg Holland, and Jonny Venters) and last two AL winners (David Price and Mike Moustakas).

However, it’s not unheard of for a player to win the award after having a flat-out lousy season the year before. That’s where Gray makes a compelling case.

Voters, rightly or wrongly, often love a good narrative when casting their ballots. Gray undoubtedly checks that box. His only full season as a member of the New York Yankees was, by most accounts, a disaster. In 130.1 innings, Gray posted a 4.90 ERA, 1.5 fWAR, and 0.6 bWAR. His peripherals were better, but that didn’t matter to the Yankees’ front office or fans.

Things only got worse at home (6.98 ERA), which quickly turned the Bronx faithful against him. Yankees fans booed him off the mound after a start on August 1. Gray smirked as he walked to the dugout, further infuriating the crowd. Shortly after, he was demoted to the bullpen and ultimately left off the postseason roster.

Yankees general manager Brian Cashman minced no words in the offseason in expressing his desire to move on from Gray: “We are going to move him if we get the right deal because I don’t think it is going to work out in The Bronx. I don’t feel like we can go through the same exercise and expect different results.” The New York media pulled no punches, either, writing headlines such as: “Yankees can’t get rid of Sonny Gray fast enough.” Yankees fans celebrated when Gray was traded to the Reds in January.

Reunited with his former pitching coach, Derek Johnson, Gray bounced back from that low point to make the All-Star Game in 2019. That makes for quite a compelling narrative. But Gray also has the numbers — both traditional and analytical — to back it up.

Here are his ranks among all qualified pitchers in an array of metrics:

  • bWAR (5.5): 11th
  • fWAR (4.1): 17th
  • ERA (2.80): 7th
  • FIP (3.43): 13th
  • xFIP (3.65): 15th
  • SIERA (3.98): 20th
  • WHIP (1.09): 13th
  • K% (28.8%): 15th
  • xwOBA (.285): 16th
  • AVG (.195): 3rd
  • GB% (51.4%): 7th

Some of these stats are more important than others, but voters will surely take all of these into account. Gray has been one of the best pitchers in baseball this season by almost every measure. That’s quite a turnaround from getting run out of town in New York eight short months ago.

Braves third baseman Josh Donaldson is likely Gray’s biggest competition given just how down his 2018 season was. Nationals starting pitcher Stephen Strasburg and Dodgers starting pitcher Hyun-Jin Ryu are also candidates. Both pitched well in 2018 but were limited by injuries. Kris Bryant will likely find himself in the mix, too, after dealing with injuries and regression last year.

How does Gray stack up against this competition? If the voters prefer the underdog narrative, very well. The other candidates were all injured in 2018. But past seasons indicate voters are often intrigued by players coming off major injuries or who missed a majority of the previous season. Donaldson (134 wRC+) meets that standard after playing in only 52 games last year.

Strasburg has arguably had the best season of the entire group (3.29 FIP, 3.22 xFIP, 5.3 fWAR), but he did at least throw 130 innings last season. Is that enough of a “setback” to make him the Comeback Player of the Year in the voters’ eyes? Ryu threw only 82.1 innings in 2018 but was dominant in that limited time (1.97 ERA, 3.00 FIP, 3.11 xFIP). He was also a postseason hero for the Dodgers. Will voters consider his 2019 season (2.35 ERA, 4.4 fWAR) as much of a comeback as other players in contention since he threw so well when he was on the field last year? Bryant (139 wRC+, 5.2 fWAR) has rebounded after an injury-plagued 2018, but he hasn’t quite returned to the MVP standards he set for himself in his first two seasons.

From a statistical perspective, it’s hard to compare position players to pitchers. WAR is one of the few stats by which both are measured, making it the natural comparison tool. The table below uses the average of FanGraphs and Baseball Reference WAR and includes 2017 WAR to show how far the given player “fell” last season.

Gray fares extremely well in this simplified analysis. Donaldson is the only player to add more WAR from 2018 to 2019. Bryant had the largest fall from 2017 to 2018, but he hasn’t quite reproduced his value the same way Donaldson and Strasburg have.

It will ultimately come down to an unscientific process, as most awards voting does. Each player has an argument, and we could throw Corey Seager and Willson Contreras into the mix as well. The vague language of the award makes it even murkier.

Some voters may look at it strictly analytically: how much more WAR was the player worth to their team compared to last year? Some may vote based on the player with the “best” redemption story — however they choose to quantify that. Others may vote based on whether the player helped their team make the postseason, an unfair but still common standard in the major awards. Voting may be tainted by various other biases as well.

On paper and based on how voters usually decide — the bigger the previous year’s setback, the better — Gray and Donaldson seem like the two best bets to win the award. If Gray gets the hardware, he’d become the Reds’ first Comeback Player of the Year since Ken Griffey Jr. in 2005. Think he misses the Bronx yet?

19 Responses

  1. Steve Schoenbaechler

    It’s just nice to have a couple quality starters on this staff again. It’s been a while.

    • Colorado Red

      If Trevor pitches like he did in the last few starts, it could be 3 quality starters.
      Not sure what was going on, but it is potentially corrected.

      • Mason Red

        He’s inconsistent at best. Definitely not a reliable #3.

      • Sean D

        I disagree, he is better than inconsistent. He is a very good pitcher and yeah I would say his 2018 season was an over-performance, but this season he has dealt with so much inconsistency in his environment it’s fair that he’s been inconsistent. I’d take him as a #3 on any staff!

  2. Jeff Gangloff

    Gotta give credit where credit is due – the Reds have made some pretty decent trades lately.

    Shed Long for Sonny Gray
    Simon for Suarez
    Straily for Castillo

    Then you have the Cueto, Chapman, Bruce trades in which no player the Reds got has produced significantly.

    Just think where this rebuild/team would be right now if it weren’t for the Gray, Suarez, and Castillo trades? Man.

    • SultanofSwaff

      Now the question is—where do they go from here? I’m quite reluctant to trade Tyler Stephenson or Jonathon India, but at the same time there is a sense of urgency to compete while they control Bauer (and Votto isn’t getting younger) and the little matter of 6 straight losing seasons.

    • AirborneJayJay

      Just think where this rebuild/team would be if they had just gotten 1 or 2 impact players in the Cueto, Chapman, Bruce, and Frazier trades. BP, Bailey and Mesoraco were salary dumps and they got zero back. They got zero, zip on Cozart. Hamilton was a salary dump.
      You did leave off the Latos for DeSclafani trade as one on the plus side for the Reds.
      By the way, how is that trade with the LA Dodgers last December looking now from your perch in LA?? Not good at all, not good at all. Disastrous is the first word that comes to mind. One of the worst trades in the history of the Reds franchise. That trade in itself kneecapped the rebuild. Give credit where credit is due.
      The Reds are on the verge of showing MLB how NOT to do a rebuild, while Houston and Atlanta lead the way in how to do a successful rebuild.

      • Michael Smith

        Frazier trade brought something back. You could argue it should have landed more (i would disagree, Frazier was on the wrong side of age and not that good but that is neither here nor there). They had at least one above average season out of a shortstop and schebler did put up two solid 4th outfielder seasons.

      • Jeff Gangloff

        I agree with the Frazier trade – that’s why I left it off the “bad” trade list. I think the Reds made out OK in that trade. They got some production from Peraza and Shebs.

      • citizen54

        Agree completely. Disco doesn’t get enough credit around here and that Dodgers trade was a dumpster fire. I think the Cueto trade was fine. All three pitchers had promise.

  3. lost11found

    Sad to say, but Strasburg will probably get it. moreso if the nationals make the playoffs after Harper leaves in FA along with the injuries to Scherzer.

  4. ToBeDetermined

    Airborne

    “By the way, how is that trade with the LA Dodgers last December looking now from your perch in LA?? Not good at all, not good at all. Disastrous is the first word that comes to mind. One of the worst trades in the history of the Reds franchise. That trade in itself kneecapped the rebuild.”

    Could you please explain. Currently, I don’t see that trade as either moving the needle much one way or the other from the Reds perspective.

    Positives – Saved some $ on the Homer Bailey for Kemp contracts.
    1/2 year of Puig.
    Trevor Bauer for 2020 from the Puig flip. How he’ll perform in 2020 is TBD
    Farmer as a super utility player

    Negatives – Young prospects – TBD

    • Jeff Gangloff

      Right? If anything I chalk that one up as a W for the Reds.

      • citizen54

        That trade was horrible. Ultimately the Reds ended up trading two 50FV prospects for Farmer. Wood and Puig would have been gone at the end of the year and Baily produced more fWAR than both of them combined.

        Jay isn’t wrong. This trade is probably worse that the Chapman fiasco. Reds would have been way better off right now if they hadn’t made that trade. Even if Wood had been an average pitcher, the Reds would have gained a whole 1fWAR by making the trade.

        Also, it wasn’t Puig for Bauer. It was Puig plus the the Reds #1 prospect for Bauer. The Indians made out like bandits in that trade.

    • Sean D

      100% agree! You can’t judge a trade like that so quickly, it was more or less franchise altering when you account for losing Trammell for Bauer so we have yet to see how it’ll turn out. So far with Trammells struggles I’d say it’s leaning towards a W

  5. TR

    In spite of another overall disappointing year from the Reds, I am optimistic about the Reds starting pitching staff backed up by a well-regarded pitching coach. Now if the FO can do something about the offense and bullpen, the Reds could be a surprise in 2020.

  6. SultanofSwaff

    Off topic, but Milwaukee has a -24 run differential. They should be 9 games worse yet they’re battling for the division title.

    Why does it seem like wanting the Reds to just be respectable is an impossible ask?!?

  7. CI3J

    In another losing season, the Reds should still have a few players in contention for postseason awards.

    TECHNICALLY, the Reds aren’t assured another losing season yet. If they win their final 10 games, they will finish 81-81, right at .500. Of course, the chances of that happening are vanishingly small, but, as they say, that’s why they play the games.

  8. lost11found

    Sadly, Strasburg and the others on playoff contendging teams have an edge. but of those mentioned in the post, I would say strasburg has the inside track. Name, reputation, Nats lost Harper to FA, and Scherzer’s been hurt. He’ll be seen as the stalwart that’s led them to post-season contention even if they come up a bit short.