Eugenio Suarez is good. As Reds fans, we know that. Fans from around the league, however, are not as well informed. You can’t blame Suarez for not trying to get recognition though. Since 2017 he ranks in the top ten among all third baseman in WAR and wRC+. Here is a graph showing exactly how much he has improved.

As good as he has been, top ten in just one position isn’t something to write home about. A closer look at how good that top ten is reveals exactly why not many people talk about Suarez. Third base is absolutely loaded.

In the past three seasons, Suarez has accumulated 11 fWAR while posting a 125 wRC+. Those are strong numbers, but look at some of the names ahead of him. Heck, look at the names behind him. Clearly, there are some studs that currently occupy the hot corner. So where would Suarez rank if he played another position?

Catcher is a tough spot to compare to since the defensive requirements are so much different and it doesn’t take an elite bat to be near the top of the list. The rest of the rankings, however,  highlight that Suarez is probably being overshadowed by his position group. If he were playing anywhere else, there is a good chance people would talk about him more.

At first base, a spot reserved for strong hitters who are limited in the field, the offensive production is on par with third base but overall value with defense factored in is more limited. True hitters like Anthony Rizzo and Joey Votto outpace Suarez at the plate, but Cody Bellinger (mostly a RF now), Freddie Freeman and Paul Goldschmidt are the only players with more overall value. That’s not bad company.

2nd base has been dominated by one name recently; Jose Altuve. He has been an offensive machine that outweighs any slight negative value his defense may bring. On the other hand, Javier Baez’s defense drives his fWAR just slightly above Suarez despite his bat not quite being up to Suarez’s level. Baez may come in higher on this list. but I wouldn’t trade Suarez for Baez straight up. Just saying.

Shortstop is also loaded right now with a lot of balanced players who are strong with the bat and the glove. Francisco Lindor is a true superstar with Xander Bogaerts not too far behind. Andrelton Simmons, Manny Machado, Trevor Story and Marcus Semien also headline the position with above 11 WAR. Even with all those players, Carlos Corea is the only shortstop with a higher wRC+ (130) than Suarez. Defense obviously counts for something, but if the game is on the line at the plate, Suarez would be as good a choice as any of those players.

The outfield has some big-time names that highlight the kind of company Suarez has put himself in. Mike Trout, Mookie Betts and Christian Yelich comprise the top three to no surprise, a bit out of Eugenio’s league. The three spots ahead of Suarez though? Bryce Harper (2015 NL MVP), Giancarlo Stanton (2017 NL MVP) and Charlie Blackmon. Not too shabby. His 11 fWAR put him ahead of some very good players, including Lorenzo Cain, Whit Merrifield, Marcell Ozuna, Michael Brantley, Andrew Benintendi, Justin Upton, Starling Marte and Andrew McCutcheon (2013 MVP). That is getting the job done.

The point of all this is to show that while Suarez has been a top 30 player in baseball since 2017, it makes sense that he has been overlooked. That is because TEN players ahead of him play third base. With that much competition at one position, the player in the lesser media markets (Cincinnati is 35th nationally) or on the worse teams (no explanation needed here) will naturally get less attention. Even Anthony Rendon, who has been way better than Suarez and plays in Washington D.C. on a team that has World Series potential, gets overlooked. it’s tough out there for third basemen these days.

As Redleg Nation’s Ashley Davis wrote recently, while the Reds continue to swing and miss on their five -year-and-counting rebuild, take some time to appreciate the positives. Eugenio Suarez is absolutely one of those.

25 Responses

  1. Pete

    ” True hitters like Anthony Rizzo and Joey Votto outpace Suarez at the plate,”

    Matthew? Huh? wRC=:
    Votto: 100
    Suarez: 127

    I’m missing something, can you explain? I know love is blind but this is really stretching the Votto narrative.

    • Lucas

      Since he was taking 3 year totals, Votto’s wRC+ over the last 3 is 133 and Suarez’s was 112. I don’t think its really pushing the Votto narrative either. You’re comparing a player in their prime (Suarez) with a player on the wrong side of 35.

    • Lucas

      Excuse my off numbers had it on away split, but total its actually still in Votto’s favor:
      Votto: 134
      Suarez: 126

      Suarez having slightly more WAR.

  2. SultanofSwaff

    I haven’t kept up…..with the labor talks, is there the potential for the DH in the NL next year? If so, I’d be all in on Rendon. Would be great to rotate him/Suarez/Votto.

    • TR

      I imagine there is potential for the DH in the NL but I doubt it will happen. It reminds me of the old days at Crosley Field where the AL scores took up a very small space on the scoreboard. At that time it was probably difficult for tradition bound Cincy to acknowledge the AL actually existed.

  3. Pete

    Ugh, tonight’s line versus LHP:
    Blandino – 3B
    Votto – 1B
    Suarez – DH
    Aquino – RF
    Iglesias – SS
    Ervin – CF
    Galvis – 2B
    Peraza – LF
    Casali – C

    No surprises.

      • Ed

        I’m asking what your lineup would be not to be snarky at all- I’m genuinely confused as to how one could organize this group of guys into some kind of offense that could make sense! Would’ve loved to see more at-bats from Lorenzen and JVM, and Galvis could sit imho. No O’Grady yet again.

      • Pete

        For tonight versus a LHP:

        Ervin – LF
        Votto -1B
        Aquino – RF
        Suarez – 3B
        Lorenzen – CF
        O’Grady – DH
        Casali – C
        VanMeter – 2B
        Blandino – SS

        My lineup would score more runs than Bell’s.

      • Pete

        Ed – exactly. I want to see as much of Alex and O’Grady as possible.

      • Ed

        Pete, what’re your current thoughts on JVM as the everyday second baseman?

      • Pete

        Ed, honestly I don’t know. He has the bat, does the have the glove? It would be nice to see him get an opportunity to show what he has. It appears the Reds have already made up their mind. Unless they deal Winker, JVM seams destined to be a super sub.

        In today’s version of baseball with so many K’s, BB’s and HR’s; defense isn’t as high a priority. You look at the lineups the Astros, Yankees and Dodgers run out there and it’s might impressive. Unless JVM is just God awful I have no issue with him starting at 2B. I’m far more concerned about Lorenzen because it could be he ‘s another masher we desperately need. I guess we won’t find out anytime soon…..

      • Ed

        I think Farmer has been hurt for a while now

      • Ed

        Sucks- like a full week out with shoulder soreness, off the bench the last couple nights

  4. Chris Holbert

    I have not heard anything about Farmer being hurt. If so I understand otherwise, he brings more to the table that Blandion or Galvis.

    • Ed

      Yeah- he’s on the 10 day IL with an oblique strain since the 4th

  5. Chris Holbert

    I think the Reds need to put those young lefties in there to see if they can dispel the DB belief that when you are young and lefthanded, you are automatically a platoon player, O’Grady, JVM, this is the prove it time..

    • Big Ed

      Votto has a .658 OPS against lefties. He is the one who ought to sit against lefties. Use VanMeter and O’Grady rather than Galvis and Votto.

      The curse of the big contract is not so much the decline in the out years, but that the teams feel compelled to play the aging contract more than they should, and bat him in the same position in the order that it did when the guy was young. If they would give Votto 425 plate appearances, and hit him 5th, then he would still be useful. But they want to give him 575 plate appearances (600 this year) and hit him second.

      • Curt

        Right you are Big Ed, it’s not the decline and it’s not even the money itself. It’s when decisions on how to use a player are based on lifetime achievement rather than what he’s doing in the here and now. It’s not a seniors league. He’s one of a 25 man team and should be treated no differently than anyone else. And if the player doesn’t like it, tuff. There’s nothing in a contract that guarantees a players place in the line-up or how often he plays and the player gets his money regardless. If a manager’s decision is based on anything other than what the player is bringing to the table this season and what’s best for the team now, it’s bad managing. Worse, it shows an inability to render authority in a leadership position.
        If it’s ownership making the call for whatever reason then I guess we’re stuck with it. It’s their team to make poor decisions with.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.