Last May, I wrote about Eugenio Suarez’s blazing start to 2018. A big part of his success was coming against breaking pitches, which was an area he has struggled with earlier in his career. With his offensive breakout in the books last year, it is understandable to be a little bit disappointed that Suarez is currently back down to his 2017 production. What has changed in 2019? The breaking ball is getting revenge.

After showing huge improvements in his hard hit rate across all pitch types last year, Suarez is back to his career norm against breaking balls. This is contributing to an overall drop from 45.6% to 40.9%. He is still hitting fastballs and offspeed pitches well, but pitchers have caught on and have thrown him about 5% more breaking balls compared to last year.

Another contact stat that shows huge variations from 2018 is Suarez’s barrel rate, which has shot up on fastballs but dropped a good amount of breaking and offspeed stuff.

Despite the drop in two pitch categories, his overall barrel percentage has increased from 9.7% to 11.5%, well above league average of 6.3%.

Hard hit rate and barrel rate are great indicators of contact and Statcast can put all that data together to provide expected stats, such as slugging and weighted on base average. Despite slightly increasing his hard hit rate on offspeed pitches, his xSLG has fallen off a cliff against them, as well as breaking balls.

Suarez’s actual slugging rate this year is very similar to last season (0.525 vs 0.527 last year), but he has actually been a bit fortunate relative to his expected slugging. Last year was much closer at 0.518, but so far in 2019 he is only at 0.445 xSLG based on the strength of his contact. Again, he is hitting fastballs better than ever, but he has lost his touch on the breaking and offspeed stuff.

Looking at overall production (wOBA) and expected production (xwOBA), we see more of the same. An unusual breakout year against non-fastballs in 2018 certainly contributed to his incredible overall season. This year, it has been back to reality a bit.

Looking at some underlying factors, Suarez looks to be getting underneath the ball more this year, with an increased launch angle and an above league average Under %, according to Statcast. This could be contributing to him swinging though the slower pitches more often, as his Whiff % has increased on both the breaking and offspeed types.

Another very interesting change is a huge jump in Pull % from 39.4% last year to 50.3% this year. With a league average of 36.4%, Suarez may have made a bit too many adjustments to try to maximize his power and ability to get the ball into the air. While it has paid off on fastballs, he has sacrificed a bit of his abilities against the breaking ball in the process.

 

17 Responses

  1. Steve Schoenbaechler

    I will specify, I love this. For those who are wondering since you would believe I’ve always said I didn’t like the saber stats, I never said I never liked the saber stats. I said I would only use them as a tool.

    This is the perfect use for them. They show Geno is having problems with the offspeed stuff. So, then, the hitting coach gets in there to work with Geno on that.

    Stats don’t coach. Stats are tools, provide information to coaches.

    Reply
  2. Pete

    Whoever is the best hitter going into September should bat third for the final stretch.

    Reply
  3. ToBeDetermined

    Matthew
    Great analysis !
    Regarding Suarez I assume you are suggesting he needs to make some adjustments.
    Reminds me of an old boss of mine. She’d Say “Hey, if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”

    Reply
    • jbonireland

      I think they are trying to say it is broke and needs to be fixed. All the sabermatics are great, however this season I use the eye test, and I see that he has trouble with things that are straight. No doubt Suarez has power, but he does seem to leave a lot of men on base. Of course that could be said for JOey V also.

      Reply
      • Matthew Habel

        There have been 285 runners on base for Suarez’s at-bats this year, which leads the team. 46 of those have scored so that rate is 16.1% which is behind Casali, Senzel, Farmer, Ervin and Dietrich. League average is 14.9%.

        Sure, he could be doing better and last year’s breakout will leave many people wanting more from him. But he is still hitting well this year, just not as well against breaking and offspeed balls.

  4. Pete

    Tonight’s line up. Hate to see red-hot Tucker Barnhart out but probably a good idea to pair Wood with his buddy, Kyle Farmer. Most of us would prefer VanMeter over Peraza, oh well, winning is all that matters. Probably the toughest pitching match up the Reds will face for the series in Cole Hamels.

    Senzel 8
    Votto 3
    Suarez 5
    Aquino 9
    Iglesias 6
    Ervin 7
    Peraza 4
    Farmer 2
    Wood 1

    Reply
    • RojoBenjy

      The only thing that possibly makes sense to me here is that Van Meter is nicked up and they don’t want to IL him so that he can PH.

      Reply
      • Pete

        Has to be defense: Peraza has 5 DRS in 368 innings, Josh has too few innings to mean much. In comparison, Jose Iglesias has 9 in 834. This is an eye-popper.

        Get this: Peraza would rank second behind all ML 2b in DRS!! Kolton Wang has 9, no other 2B has more than 4. This combined with Jose’s wRC+ is 83 to JVM’s 84, it can at least be justified. But I believe Josh’s hitting numbers would go up if he faced LHP on a normal basis.

        Very strange.

      • Pete

        SSS at AAA this year:

        versus RHP: .325/.412/.587/.989 – 238 PA’s
        versus LHP: .323/.423/.677/1.100 – 79 PA’s

  5. Matt WI

    Geno will resume Cub killing duty this evening. He’s been hitting them well. HR #31 is scheduled to depart in the first inning.

    Reply
    • ToBeDetermined

      MattWI
      Love your enthusiasm . Also, like how you tied Mathew’s article into Pete’s comment about tonight’s game.
      I’d love to go down to the game. But, I’m currently too busy and too poor. 🙁 🙁

      Reply
      • Don

        Fun article to read. Great info and insight.

  6. LWblogger2

    This data definitely supports the eye-test that not only noted he may have been missing or not getting all of breaking-ball, but that he’s also pulling the ball way more.

    What the eye-test can’t do is quantify the hard-hit vs soft-hit balls and also determine with near certainly the pitch type.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.