The latest in the Reds manager search from Dick Williams (per John Fay) this afternoon is that the team has contacted Eduardo Perez, but he isn’t scheduled for an interview. The end of the month is still the target date to get a new manager in place. They’ll work through this round of interviews before considering expanding the list.

David Bell is widely reported to be one of the candidates. Bell had a 12-year major league career as a third baseman, from 1995 to 2006. As a player, he spent time in the NL and AL. He won a pennant with the San Francisco Giants and has experience in the postseason. Bell’s name has also appeared on the Toronto Blue Jays’ list of possible manager hires.

More biography: Since retiring as player, the 45-year-old Bell has compiled an impressive and broad resume. He managed the Reds AA-Carolina Mudcats affiliate from 2009-2011. Then Bell managed the AAA-Louisville Bats in 2012.

For the 2013 season, Theo Epstein hired Bell as the Chicago Cubs third base coach. The analytics-centric Cardinals poached Bell from the Cubs to be their hitting coach in 2014. A year later, the Cardinals promoted Bell to be Mike Matheny’s bench coach, a job he kept for three seasons, 2015-2017. Last year, the San Francisco Giants pried Bell away from St. Louis with an offer to be the Giants VP of Player Development.

With resumé stuff out of the way, let’s take a look at what David Bell thinks. He’s talked about his approach for relating to younger players:

Melissa Lockard (The Athletic): In speaking with various minor league coaches over the past few years, several have noted to me the change in how the millennial or modern-day baseball player relates to coaching, that they want more of a collaborative effort rather than a top-down style of coaching. You had a pretty young team with the Cardinals last year. Have you seen a change in how ballplayers today want to relate to their coaches?

David Bell: I do. And what an opportunity that presents. To be a part of that and to be involved in such an exciting day and age where that can be the approach and that can be OK is pretty special. Going into this role, I plan to learn a lot more from the players than they are going to learn from me. If I can take that approach, I think amazing things can happen.

Bell has been asked a number of times what he thinks of the new data and analytical approaches available. Given Bell’s reputation as a hard-nosed player, his answer may surprise you:

But listen to Bell now, as vice president of player personnel. Hear the 45-year-old sing the virtues of data, which he and a minor-league hierarchy featuring a dozen new hires will incorporate into every facet of modernizing and running a Giants system that has slumped recently in delivering players to the major-league club.

“There’s incredible information, and it has to factor into everything we do,” Bell said during an interview at the Giants’ minor-league spring headquarters. “It’s there. If we don’t access, utilize and implement that information, we’re going to fall behind.”

Bell stressed the need for “balance,” but in the next breath he said that information is “an incredible tool that we’re going to factor into every decision we make, whether it’s game strategy to performance to sports science.”

“We’re not going to turn away from any potential edge we can create, and the information is the edge.”

Bell was not just talking about swing planes and spin rates, but also biometrics and sleep patterns, nutrition and psychology. If a minor-leaguer is struggling, the staff will not just look at video, but ask the player if everything is all right at home and what he is eating. Minor-leaguers will do yoga for physical and spiritual well-being.

“We’re going to support them in every way possible,” Bell said. “We’re not going to leave any stone unturned. We have incredible resources and we are going to use everyone to develop that player holistically in every way possible.” (Henry Schulman, San Francisco Chronicle, thanks to Grant Freking for bringing this article to my attention this morning)

Bell was asked about analytics-based managing by Melissa Lockard in The Athletic interview. His response was interesting, particularly where he talks about his immersion for three years as bench coach with the Cardinals:

Lockard: Advanced metrics and new technology, like Trackman and Statcast, have brought a whole new layer of information for teams to access in order to evaluate their players. How much did you use that kind of information with St. Louis or elsewhere, and do you plan to utilize it with the Giants?

Bell: I know it will be used a lot. I have taken a real interest over the last four or five years in learning and researching and asking questions. I have a lot to learn still, but I certainly see it as an amazing tool that can open our minds to new ways of teaching, new ways of seeing the game.

Up until five years ago, I really didn’t know much about it. [Note: That was his time with the Reds.] Fortunately, over the past five years, I was in a position where I was looked to to be the point person to ask questions and get information and supply that information to front office and staff and players. It was a tremendous learning experience.

I think in my last role as a bench coach, it just sort of scratched the surface. In this role in player development there is an even bigger opportunity. We continue to learn new things each and every day. That’s something that’s really important to me, having a mindset and having people around me that have a mindset that we are going to get all of the information that we can. Some of it we may not use, but we are going to be open to finding the best approach in every situation.

To have factual information. To have statistics. To have all of the different types of information that is out there. To have that and to utilize that is incredible, and another part of today’s game that we are fortunate to be a part of.

Lockard: In looking at your bench coach role, how much did having that kind of information change the pregame preparation as compared to when you were playing?

Bell: Oh, it did. It changed a lot. It still takes an open mind. You can have the information and you can choose to use it or not. I’ve seen both. I have seen it utilized and taken in and used for practice and used to develop game plans and to have better ways to practice. I’ve seen it incorporated in the daily schedule.

Really, it goes beyond that, too. If you think about it, one of the greatest challenges that we have as baseball players is our schedule and the grind of our schedule. There is incredible information that is out there now that we can utilize to properly rest our players. Constantly have rest and recovery on our minds to stay strong and healthy.

I think that is one area that baseball, in general, has a ton of room for improvement. How do we have all of this information and guys are still getting hurt at such a high rate? Putting a dent into that would be a great goal because there is just nothing more important than keeping players on the field.

Beyond managing four years in the Reds system, David Bell’s “Cincinnati Connection” ticket is fully punched. Bell grew up here in town, playing for a Moeller High School State Championship team. His grandfather Gus Bell played outfield for the Reds from 1953-1961 and was named to four All-Star teams. David Bell’s father, Buddy Bell played a few years 1985-88 for the Reds, while putting together a 66-WAR career, winning six Gold Gloves and earning five All Star Game appearances. Buddy Bell works in the Reds front office now.

When David Bell managed the club’s minor league affiliates, it was widely and openly discussed that he was being groomed to someday become the Reds manager. That was when Walt Jocketty was in control of the Reds.

To be sure, the minor league teams Bell managed for the Reds didn’t win. But that’s not a great way to evaluate minor league managers. Team talent varies and fluctuates throughout the season based on the needs of the major league club.

Beyond that, David Bell isn’t that guy any more.

Like the players he’s in charge of, Bell has developed. He’s immersed himself in analytics and the waves of brand new information available to help baseball teams win. He has worked in two organizations — the Cubs and Cardinals — that eat, breathe and sleep modern approaches to baseball. The day-to-day experience as bench coach for the Cardinals is a strong credential for Bell that postdates his time in Cincinnati.

All that said, this post isn’t a campaign for David Bell. It’s not even a modest call for him to be hired.

John Farrell may be a superior candidate. So might any number of other, yet unknown and unconsidered, applicants.

Here’s the point: It would be wrong for the Reds to select a manager based on past connections with the organization or current family ties in the front office. But it would be equally misguided to reject an otherwise qualified candidate because he does.

In this case, it would be a mistake for we fans to dismiss David Bell as an insider. Bell has had valuable recent experience with other organizations. For years, I’ve been clamoring for the Reds to pick-off a young coach who has worked closely with a successful analytics-emphasizing organization. David Bell fits that description.

One final, delicious morsel of speculative palace intrigue:

If the Reds front office is hamstrung by clashing ideas — from what to do about Scooter Gennett, Billy Hamilton, trades, free agents, etc. — it would be wonderful if David Bell proved to be a successful candidate for manager. One acceptable to ownership, Walt, Jocketty, Dick Williams and his analytics folks.

52 Responses

  1. Bill j

    I like your statement “when Walt Jockerty was in charge”, most all of us think he still is.

    • Steve Mancuso

      Ha. I rewrote that sentence about a half dozen times with varying degrees of snark. In the end, opted for playing it straight. But yeah, you have to wonder how things work there.

      • David

        Using “Grammarly” could have helped. Or not. And that is just kidding, too.

    • MrRed

      Bill, that’s only partially true. Bob Castellini is in charge and don’t you forget it. Walt is his guy but I suspect that he’s gone against Walt’s advice more than once too.

  2. Jim Walker

    I came across The Athletic interview yesterday and came away with much the same view. Bell seems to be an old school guy with a new way view and a Cincinnati insider who has been around enough blocks to not really be the typical insider.

    Bell also seems to be emerging as one of the hotter properties in the manager market.

    John Fay wrote in the Enquirer today that Dick Williams said the Reds would “…probably get to the end of next week and see where we are,” There are different ways of interpreting that quote; but, to me it seems like he hopes to offer the job by that point. I think that is a smart move if he is looking to nab Bell or someone else who may also be involved with other teams.

  3. Matthew Habel

    Initially I completely dismissed him as a family/Cincinnati/familiar hire. His new mindset is certainly appealing but I think it is still a case of being underwhelmed in general by the external interview list so far. Hopefully they add in some coaches from playoff teams as they start to get eliminated.

    • Jim Walker

      But if Williams is also working to appease Castellini’s comfort zone, someone like Bell may be the best he can hope for.

      • David

        I think that is a very cogent point. Castellini may accept him for one reason, while Williams wants something else. He may be the best “compromise” candidate. However, I wonder how many potential field managers will knowingly put up with what some of us perceive as Castellini’s interference in running the team on a daily basis.

      • greenmtred

        If, as we suspect, Castellini meddles in baseball operations, it may require a new manager with stature to stand up to him, and this would best be done early in the tenure, maybe as a condiditon of accepting the job offer.

  4. Hotto4Votto

    Bell does seem to have embraced information and analytics. He does have experience in what I would consider well run (at least recently) organizations. If the Reds make a typical Reds hire (younger relative of someone in FO or in the organization, formerly in this case) it seems they could do a lot worse. I’d like to know more about some of the other candidates.

    • Jim Walker

      That Enquirer article I linked above talks about some of them but not in the depth here.

  5. WVRedlegs

    The Reds front office could be rocked with turmoil this winter, and it won’t be only by roster decisions. This current federal investigation looking at free agent signings out of Latin America is going to closely examine the Reds signing of Aroldis Chapman. If Jocketty did something illegal to win over Chapman’s “agents” then it will come out in this investigation. Remember, that Chapman’s signing came out of the blue clear sky and left field. Many in baseball were surprised when the Reds procured Chapman’s signing and services. Also remember that there was some turmoil just after Chapman signed and it was about agent representation and it got ugly. Chapman even got some death threats.
    Bell or Farrell, or Girardi, the Reds would best serve themselves by getting a manager named soon and start getting some heavy work completed before Jocketty brings down the front office. I just have a feeling that this is going to blow up big on the Reds front office, just as they are trying to turn the corner on this rebuild.
    Do the Reds already know this? That the Chapman signing is being investigated and they have already been served subpoenas? I had wondered if the re-assignments of Buckley and Graupe earlier had anything to do with Farrell’s evaluations. Maybe not. But they may have more to do with this federal investigation. Buckley and his office would have been in charge of getting all the information on Chapman from scouting reports and evaluations to agent representation information, to making communications avenues with Chapman’s reps. And Graupe would have been in charge of Buckley and signed off on any dealings. Jocketty also was intimately involved with the Chapman process too.
    Bell, Farrell or whoever, they need to get them on board soon.

  6. I-71_Exile

    I interpreted David Bell’s comments as a whole lot of nothing: “I learn a lot more from the players than they are going to learn from me” coach speak with some points about keeping people fresh throughout the season detail.

    I recall David Bell from a radio interview when he was here in Louisville in 2012 and was shocked by how uninspiring he was. I know baseball is not all rah-rah, but I’d like a manager who felt he had something to offer the players knowledge-wise and a personality that could help inspire their best.

    David Bell may just be a dull interview. I don’t know. We’ve never met.

    • Matt WI

      And dull isn’t necessarily a bad thing… I’ve listened to plenty of Craig Counsell post game interviews and radio snippits. Boooorrrrinng. But it works for them. Fits the mold around here. Ever here Paul Chryst speak as the Badgers head coach? That guy comes across with almost zero personality, and yet they win a lot too.

      • doofus

        Ya gotta love how Belichick deals with the media. His mono-syllabic answers are refreshing change to the usual lame-bromides we most often get from head coaches. He’s a hoot.

  7. lwblogger2

    Nice post Steve. Thanks for sharing that insight.

  8. BurgRed

    I hope someone in Cincinnati, such as yourself Steve, gets ahead of this story for us Reds fans. It sounds like this is what we will be discussing with interest this Winter.

    • greenmtred

      I hope, deeply, that we’re also discussing exciting additions to the roster. I caught the last two innings of last night’s Brewers–Rockies game, and realized that I had nearly forgotten how exciting baseball can be.

      • greenmtred

        “Caught,” in this case, referring to watching, not playing the most difficult position.

  9. Timmy RedLeg

    I believe Farrell was brought in this past season to be the Reds Mgr in ‘19. I could be wrong. I usually am, lol. In all seriousness, Farrell is only an insider because he was with the organization this past season. He was brought in to evaluate the org from top to bottom. From what I understand he is one of the better talent evaluators in the game. I like the idea that he’s spent a season on the National League side, sense he had been an American League guy for so long. My point is that he was hired as an outsider, this past season, to come in and perform an unbiased evaluation of this org. He has recent experience and success as a Major League Mgr. The Reds need a winner to lead this team. Farrell has won a World Series as a Mgr. It could be a match.

    • Greg

      Speaking of Farrell and being here to evaluate this past season. I’d love to know what he came up with in that evaluation.

  10. BigRedMike

    The Reds need a manager that understands how baseball is played today. Old school style is worthless and provides little value to a team that is already well behind on a talent level.

    A manager that is on the same page as management would be the preference, whatever that plan of management is.

    As long as it is not Riggelman.

    At the same time, not sure it matters whom the manager is with a front office that thinks they can run the same team out there next season and expect different results. Yet, that is apparently the plan

  11. seanuc

    I’m struck by the humility in Bell’s interviews. I would imagine he would be well received by the players. I would have no objection if he were hired. But even though I gravitate to the statistics and analytics, the cultural fit is probably most important given baseball’s grinding schedule. For all the poor strategic decisions Dusty made, he knew how to relate to players and draw the best out of them. So to my surprise, I am hoping for one of the experienced managers like Girardi, Farrell, or Molitor.

  12. Great Redlegs Fan

    After watching last night game between at Milwakee, I just can think that just a few seasons ago the Brewers were worse than the Reds and now they deploy such a good team in the field, with plenty of depth at all parts of the game, not to mention they got Yelich. Very effective and smooth management decisions translated into success, good for them.

  13. Scott Gennett

    After watching last night game at Milwakee, I just can think that just a few seasons ago the Brewers were worse than the Reds and now they deploy such a good team in the field, with plenty of depth at all parts of the game, not to mention they got Yelich. Very effective and smooth management decisions translated into success, good for them.


    • greenmtred

      Yes. It’s looking to me as though all of you guys who were so high on Yelich were right. He would clearly have been a great addition to the Reds. They need pitching with him or without him, but they need the hitting he would provide, as well.

      • Kyle Farmer

        I agree. Have to eat some crow on that. I thought the Brewers gave up too much and was happy the Reds didn’t give away the store for him. Looks like they made the right call on that one.

      • lwblogger2

        Lots of BBQ sauce. I eat my fair share. I still say we can’t judge the Yelich trade yet but initial results are maybe the Reds should have parted with Senzel, Trammell, and Lopez for him (basically Doug’s equivalent package to what Brewers gave up)

      • greenmtred

        Tomato-based sauce, or vinegar? I agree that it’s hard to draw firm conclusions about the non-deal now, particularly since we have no idea what sorts of careers Senzel et al will have, but Yelich sure would look good in the Reds’ outfield.

    • Kyle Farmer

      Yeah, but they let Scooter Gennett get away!

  14. Kyle Farmer

    I think Bell may have moved to the top of my list (which virtually guarantees he won’t get the job). Saw many say he was too “old school” for the job but that may just have been a leftover perception from his days in the Reds “old school” organization.

    I can see him being a bridge between what seems to be the two warring factions in baseball operations which would be a very good thing.

    Added bonus – a former Cardinal to appease Jocketty.

  15. Kyle Farmer

    One question on the timing of this – Williams has said he wants to name a manager by the end of the month. However, the World Series runs from 10/23 to 10/31. Doesn’t MLB frown on such decisions being announced during the World Series? So, it seems that they either have to be done and announce by 10/22 or wait until 11/1. Is that right?

  16. Scott C

    To me David Bell would be a good hire. He is young enough to be able to better relate to today’s players and has worked in some other organizations that are into the analytical side. I agree don’t let his connection to the Reds eliminate him from consideration. I would however like to hear a little more about Brad Ausmus and how he think and Eduardo Perez. Even Farrell, other than he was fairly successful at Boston I don’t really know how he thinks in baseball philosophy.

  17. David

    I was waiting for someone to criticize Reds management someone from the Cardinals organization. I guess he has enough Reds blood in him to alleviate that concern.

    • Sliotar


      After reading almost 50 comments, there appears to be an general acceptance/resignation.

      Bell might be the most progressive/young/out-of-the-box/whatever candidate that is acceptable to the whole of an apparently fractured Reds front office.

      There is plenty to pick apart about Bell, compared to other possible candidates working in MLB. A Bell being in the front office does not help, for a franchise rife with family ties already.

      I agree wtih I-71 Exile’s comments that what Bell has said isn’t special. Others new to adopting analyitics have said similiar. It is almost required now to say “light bulb has turned on for me.”

      However, the Reds are apparently set on who they are picking from…quite soon in the process compared to other clubs. Let us hope they have chosen wisely, given how they limit themselves.

  18. Daytonian

    A postseason note…. The Braves left Adam Duvall off their NLDS roster.

  19. Barbara Howell

    David Bell might be a better General Manager for the Reds. Sounds like he understands player development. We were driving around one night listening to sports on WLW. Before we get to the main subject, we don’t drink or do drugs. Being honest, my hearing is not great. Someone was talking about a interview with the Reds owner. They said the Reds owner said next year they would have a record payroll. They needed to find some starting pitching. Talked like ownership had plans to spend big dollars on pitching. Didn’t read this anywhere. Just the radio. Was my hearing working that day. Written and posted by Larry Baker

    • lwblogger2

      I don’t recall Williams saying “record payroll” but he has said that the Reds were prepared to significantly increase payroll.

  20. Jeff Reed

    David Bell would suit me just fine as manager of the Reds with his ‘new school’ analytics approach and wide experience. Another factor is his connection to Gus Bell, the Red’s smooth hitting centerfielder of the fifties.