We know that starters are more valuable and harder to come by than relievers. Starters pitch more innings than their bullpen compadres and must face a lineup multiple times. Because of these factors, starters often have a different skillset than relievers.

When evaluating whether a pitcher should be a starter or reliever, I like to look at three major factors, though I acknowledge there are other things to consider. My big three are as follows:

  • Raw stuff
  • Command
  • Health

A pitcher who struggles with any of these three areas can find himself in the bullpen. Those with the stuff may not be able to command it. Pitchers with good command but only two worthwhile pitches may become too predictable to work through a lineup two or three times. Starters who get chronically injured end up in the bullpen because their arms can’t handle 175+ innings.

That brings us to Brandon Finnegan. After losing most of 2017 to injury, Finnegan arrived to Spring Training with a starting pitching spot locked up. Yes, Bryan Price (remember him?) framed it differently, suggesting that Finnegan merely had a leg up on the competition. But even with Amir Garrett pushing the issue and Finnegan struggling with injury and performance (8 hits and 2 walks in 5.1 innings), the Reds handed Finnegan a rotation spot.

What gave the Reds such confidence in Finnegan? Presumably, it was a solid 12-start stretch at the end of 2016 where Finnegan posted a 2.93 ERA. Quite impressive. Since then, the Reds have insisted through their actions that Finnegan is a cut above the other young starters competing for rotation spots.

However, an ERA over a relatively small span can be deceiving. For example, Michael Lorenzen’s had a 3.38 ERA through his first ten starts in the Major Leagues. He was keeping runs off the board but was he pitching well? The more predictive statistics would suggest no.

Lorenzen was striking out only 14.8% of batters and walking an alarming 12.5% in that span. His SIERA, maybe the best predictor of future ERA, was 5.38. It was only a matter of time before things went south. Lorenzen’s ERA over his next ten starts was 8.32, even as the metrics improved some.

The lesson? ERA doesn’t mean everything, at least when it comes to future performance. Finnegan had a 2.93 ERA in the second half of 2012, and his strikeout rate improved drastically from the first half as he developed a nasty changeup. He also lowered his SIERA from 5.39 to 4.25; no doubt, Finnegan improved quite a bit and showed he has the stuff to be a starter.

That still leaves two important factors to consider, and both of those look less rosy for Finnegan.

While his BB% improved from the first half in 2016, it was still 10.6%, which would have been the third worst BB% in all of baseball over a full season, with 10.7% being the worst. It’s hard to walk that many people and maintain success. Finnegan also let up 11 homeruns in those 13 starts.

Overall, Finnegan posted the worst BB% (11.4%) of any qualified starting pitcher in 2016.

Two things can simultaneously be true about Finnegan’s second half in 2016: his stuff improved dramatically as he developed his changeup, and his control problems remained a red flag to his long-term starting chances.

It’s early, but Finnegan has struggled mightily with command to begin the season. He has nine walks in 12.1 innings and only ten strikeouts.  He’s let up 18 hits.

We can’t discount the fact that Finnegan hasn’t pitched much in the last year and that he might be rusty. Also, young pitchers improve their control/command all the time. Finnegan just turned 25, so he has time to figure it out.

But another major concern with Finnegan starting long term is his health. In 2017, a year after throwing more professional innings than he ever had, he injured the same muscle twice. He had a slight setback in Spring Training this year.

Those injuries do not disqualify him from starting, even if they are troublesome. My biggest fear is that Finnegan’s herky jerky mechanics led to such injuries and that they will continue to do so. His max effort delivery looks more in line with a lefty reliever than a starter, and if it causes health problems, it doesn’t matter how much Finnegan’s command improves.

We’ve seen some awkward and concerning deliveries work out in the past. Chris Sale is a good example. So, I think it unwise to discount Finnegan solely on the basis of his strained-looking mechanics; I can’t ignore it either.

By my big three test, Finnegan remains a major question mark as to whether he should start or work out of the pen. He has the stuff, but until he shows he can command those pitches and stay healthy, Finnegan should not get the benefit of the doubt over other young pitchers.

I’m not ready to give up on Finnegan pitching 175+ innings, but he should be in the same group as Tyler Mahle, Sal Romano, Amir Garrett, and Robert Stephenson and not a cut above. His second half in 2016 was encouraging; it was not entirely clarifying.

Join the conversation! 21 Comments

  1. What is amazing to me is that Lorenzen and Garrett are both in the pen presumably although not specifically stated in Garrett’s case because of concern for health issues though Finnegan is deemed a starter although he has had more health issue than others. Although all three may all be relievers, I believe at least Garrett deserves a shot at starting over Finnegan. Finnegan should work his issues out in the pen before getting another chance to start.

  2. I am pleased with the performance so far of Bailey, Castillo and Mahle, for varying reasons, and comfortable that they deserve to start until injury or sustained poor performance forces a change. I am much less pleased and much less comfortable with Romano and Finnegan so far. But if you group them with Garrett, Stephenson, and perhaps Reed and Lorenzen, someone has to start two days of every five, at least until DeSclafani is healthy again. And I’m fine with Sal and Brandon in those slots, for now. But they do need to perform, otherwise it should be a matter of (to borrow the Cossack’s phrase) next man up. I won’t be surprised if neither Romano or Finnegan is in the starting five in June. But if they are I hope it’s because they’ve performed well. If not then Amir, Bob, Cody and Michael will all be happy for, and would be deserving of, a chance to take their place.

  3. All of these young pitchers should not be viewed as “maybe a starter, if not, bullpen guy.” Pick a role, try and develop the pitcher in that role. If it does not work, replace the player.

    Atlanta and its rebuild and its players have been used as a comparison a lot this week. The Braves have stuck with young guys like Teheran and Foltynewicz in their rotation, and not suggested they go to the bullpen during rough patches.

    I have used the word “rudderless” to describe formation of the roster and how it used. The shuffling of pitchers and the 4-man outfield, including Winker not playing every day in LF, are continuing examples of it.

    Jim Walker has sarcastically asked this week where the “urgency” is, and he is spot on.

  4. No. No. And No.
    He’s not a bad prospect, but he is what he is IMO: a bullpen arm.

  5. I say it is time to stick a fork in the Reed, Finnegan, Lamb experiment and move on!

    • I agree

    • Why?

    • I second the comment of JREIS. It’s time to move on and see if Reed and Finnegan can cut it in the bullpen. With the remainder of this season, where the Reds are going nowhere in the standings, concentrate on Bailey, Castillo, Romano, Mahle and Garrett as the starting staff. Then if DeSclafani is ever injury-free, include him in the mix. With the interruption the 2015 All-Star game caused to the rebuild, it’s past time to concentrate on the young players and let filler-type veterans go.

    • How’s Cueto pitching for the Royals? Oh wait. He’s with the Giants. An ERA of 0.35. Best to start a season for the Giants since Ray Sadeki in 1968 with 0.25. Reed, Finnegan and Lamb combined will never equal the pitcher Cueto is now.

      • but do they equal one or two months of Cueto?

      • There’s another lefthander the Reds should have acquired in the Cueto deal instead of anyone of the 3 that they did receive…Sean Manaea. He was a 2013 Royal’s 1st rounder. Why do other team’s GM’s constantly run circles around Jocketty/Williams?

  6. I was really excited about Finnegan last spring! As noted he had a 2.93 era in the 2nd half of 2016 and opened up last season by reaching 96-97 in his first start or 2. Now he’s throwing 90-91? He just doesn’t have enough command for mediocre stuff. No way. Perhaps he could help in the pen and air out to 93-94, but he’s going nowhere in the rotation at 90 mph? Maybe warmer weather will loosen him up, but he’s never had good command. No reason he should be penciled in ahead of the others? You either produce or you don’t.

    • I didn’t like his velocity at all. Now, pitching is about way more than velocity and LHP can even do more with less than RHP in most cases. The command and movement on all his offerings will have to improve however if Finnegan is going to keep working in the 90-92 mph range. If not, I’m not even sure he’s an MLB player at all as I don’t see his velocity going up much working out of the pen.

      Assuming he isn’t still injured, he should be able to get back to mid-90s and with even marginal improvements in his command, he may yet be a starter.

  7. Now that the reds season has imploded the roster has the players that should have been there since day one.

    Gone are Pennington,Gosselin,Quackenbush Gallardo,all of the minor league invites that should have never made the major league roster.Maybe,just maybe,the Reds are starting to get it.Play the kids.

    We knew this as fans but the FO for some insane reason didnt.

    We all know that Hamiltons role needs to be diminished but thats still not happened,Senzel needs to be brought up and playing and Amir needs to be in the rotation.All these will happen .The question is how long will the FO take to make these adjustments.

  8. Probably not at the MLB level. But that’s just my uneducated opinion.

  9. Is Finny a starter? Not as of now. It’s time put him back in the bullpen, where he early had success, until he seizes the opportunity, when one arises, to get back into the rotation. His recent starts leave sufficient doubts; his past rotation successes are not sufficient to overcome the newer doubts.

  10. I’d say put Finnegan in the ‘pen but his control tells me that would be worse. He can’t consistently throw strikes until the 4th or 5th inning. Not so good for a reliever.

  11. I don’t know.
    That’s what 2018 is for. He doesn’t seem to have the velocity….but give him some more starts.

    Amir Garrett and Tyler Mahle 1 month in look like starters .

    May should be a big month.

  12. Raw stuff– not really, command– no, health– no. If Iglesias is a reliever (whose answers to those three are YES, YES, possibly no), then Finnegan better bring his coozy and boat chair down to the bullpen and get them set up with a good view of the outfield.

  13. …. No he is not. Put him in the pen, where he flourished for KC back in 2014, and promote Garrett to the rotation.

    It’s so simple, the Reds FO won’t do it.

Comments are closed.

Category

2018 Reds

Tags

, , , , ,