Reds - General

Interview with Reds beat writer Marc Lancaster, Part III

Continued from Part Two (here’s Part One, if you missed it), this is the final installment of my interview with Marc Lancaster:

Redleg Nation: That seems like a healthy approach, frankly. What’s reassuring to those of us out here is that they’re not rejecting outright, for lack of a better term, the “Moneyball” approach.

Marc Lancaster: Oh, no. Well, I’ll tell you, it’s funny, I was working on the story in spring training. I cornered Brian Cashman, the Yankees G.M., and I was sort of asking him about it, on the run, real quick. And he said he’s interested in it, but he said, “Well, I don’t have a ‘stat guy’.” And it’s funny, because the first thing I thought was that it’s not because you can’t spend the money to hire a stat guy. (laughs)

But is it surprising to anybody? No, it’s not. It’s just kind of the Yankee way, right? But I think teams like the Reds, they recognize that they’re going to have to take advantage of every possible angle to compete, in this kind of marketplace they’re in.

RN: Let’s talk briefly about the Reds. What’s your opinion on the off-season acquisitions Dan O’Brien made?

ML: Well, I think that they did…I was going to say, as well as anybody could have expected. I think they did better than anyone could have expected. Part of that is that none of us could have expected them to spend the kind of money they did. You can argue that they overpaid for Milton, and so on and so forth, but you look at the marketplace for pitchers. Dan’s been after the Reds to be able to go get one of these upper echelon pitchers, and Milton’s expected to be in that upper echelon by almost everybody.

The Mets kind of blew the market out by giving Kris Benson $8 million, so if you want to play the game, you’ve got to play the game.

But I think the key to it was basically bringing in seven players for that extra sixteen, seventeen million dollars this year. There are certainly regimes that you would hand seventeen million dollars to, and they would have signed two players. This team needed more than two new bodies.

I think you saw last night how valuable those veteran guys in the bullpen can be when they’re on. And obviously, a couple of them have not been on thus far this year, but we’re, what? Ten, twelve games into the season. Who knows how that will pan out? But you’re investing $600,000 in Ben Weber and $600,000 in Rich Aurilia. That’s not much. They’re not paying any of these guys, except Milton, a lot of money.

To me, they used their money very, very wisely.

RN: What about Dave Miley’s evident preference for veterans over youngsters? How do you see that playing out with this team?

ML: People can complain about, oh gosh, look what he’s doing. I can guarantee you that Dave Miley will take his chances every day with a guy like Weathers, or a guy like Weber or Mercker than he will with Juan Padilla, Aaron Myette, Brian Reith. Think about how many games those guys pitched last year. Those are not major league pitchers. And that sort of panned out that way.

RN: · This is something that concerns many of us in Redleg Nation: with the hot start Joe Randa has had, do you foresee the Reds signing him to an extension, thus delaying Edwin Encarnacion’s entry to the Major Leagues?

Read on…

ML: No, I don’t. If the Reds had not signed Randa, and they had gone ahead with the Kearns experiment, or even if they had signed Juan Castro and threw him over there…if they’d been in any situation other than signing Randa, Edwin probably would have been the Opening Day third baseman this year. Even though they didn’t want to do that, because he was so impressive in spring training.

Now, maybe that was because he knew he wasn’t trying to win a job. But I don’t think that anyone in the organization doubts that he will be ready to take that job over next year. No, I don’t see them going down that path with Randa. And I think Joe, at this point, he’s certainly shown a lot, but there are a lot of games left in him, and I don’t think he wants to be a caddy for a younger guy.

At this point, I think there’s sort of a mutual understanding situation here, where everybody knows what’s going on.

RN: · What do the Reds see in Rich Aurilia that causes them to keep running him out there over Felipe Lopez, who may have a chance to be the future at SS?

ML: Aaah, see, this is my favorite topic, okay? I love fans…this is where I get annoyed, because all anyone wanted to do for five years, was for the Reds to win now. People say that about Felipe all the time, that he is the future, why don’t they get him at-bats now?

What do you want to do? Do you want to develop the future guy, or do you want to win games? That’s the reason that Rich is in there. The Reds believe that Rich will win them more games. Or lose them less games. He certainly does not have near the range that Felipe does. He doesn’t have the arm that Felipe does. But having seen all but one game this spring, and during the regular season, Rich has not yet made a throw, other than that strange one last night, that hasn’t gone right into Sean Casey’s glove, with a minimum of effort from Sean Casey.

That makes a big difference.

RN: I’m not sure I agree…well, let me ask it like this: do the Reds really believe that Rich Aurilia gives them a better chance to win now?

ML: Yes. For this year, yes. That’s why he’s in there. And that’s the only reason. They know that Felipe has more talent. He’s got way more upside, obviously, at Rich’s age. But for them, they’re trying to win games right now.

That’s why they went and got a guy like Randa, instead of letting Edwin feel his way, and sort of learn on the job. And that’s why they went and got Aurilia, it’s because Aurilia will make fewer mistakes. And then you see something like last night. He’s done it twice now in the last week, where he had a key bloop, little reach out and throw the bat at the ball hit to drive in a run. And those are the kind of at-bats that they want from a veteran guy like Aurilia.

RN: Do you think Felipe will eventually take over as the starting shortstop?

ML: Yeah, I think so. Felipe or someone else.

RN: Anderson Machado or Rey Olmedo?

ML: Yeah, yeah, and I certainly think Felipe would have the edge up on that group. If it had come down to Felipe and Machado, I think Felipe would have won that job in a walk.

But yeah, I definitely think that’s the mindset that the Reds have. Right now, I don’t think anybody in the front office would object too violently if you told them that next year’s left side of the infield were going to be Lopez and Encarnacion.

RN: Last question. Do you foresee there being any chance of Dave Miley supplanting Danny Graves as the closer this season with Ryan Wagner, or someone else? And do you see Graves being traded this season?

ML: Who would take him? That’s the thing. I don’t have the numbers right here in front of me, but he’s making a lot of money, and that’s the hangup. Nothing against Danny, I think obviously Danny makes it interesting every time out. But he does get the job done more often than not. You know? He gets it done.

That’s not to say that … well, I think a lot of people would say that what they’ve seen over, say, the last half-year, they’d be comfortable with Wagner slipping into that role. But it’s just not a viable option right now.

As for trading Graves, the only situation where I could imagine would be if Mariano Rivera continues to fall apart and the Yankees want to go get somebody, and have to go get somebody in their bullpen at the deadline. Maybe they would be a team that could take on Danny’s money. And at this point, it’s his last year of his contract, so that’s something. There’s not a lot of teams that would take on that kind of money, unless it’s a short-term proposition. Unless it’s for a lights-out, Trevor Hoffman kind of closer.

RN: Ryan Wagner closer any chance, demoting Graves, or cant because of money….ryan’s going to make a lot of money in this league

ML: I don’t know. That’d be a real sticky road to walk on. But I don’t think it’s out of the realm of possibility, either. Especially if Ryan continues to throw the way he has. He’s been awesome.

But I don’t know. I think that it’s certainly out there, but I think Graves would have to go into a complete meltdown, and that means more than what he’s just done the last few days. I mean, he’s going to have to lose a lot of games, probably. Well, not a lot, but he’s going to have to lose before people start to talk about that, and he really hasn’t done that yet.

But it’s sure interesting every time he throws.

RN: Any chance Graves will be re-signed at the end of the season?

ML: I would be very surprised if that happens, just because of the young arms that they have: Hudson and Coffey and Wagner, you’ve got Allan Simpson, Joe Valentine. I don’t see it happening.

RN: Well, that’s encouraging, I guess. Thanks for taking the time for Redleg Nation. I know our readers will appreciate the opportunity to get to know a little more about you and what you do.

ML: Not a problem. I enjoyed it. Hope we can do it again sometime.

12 thoughts on “Interview with Reds beat writer Marc Lancaster, Part III

  1. Rich has not yet made a throw, other than that strange one last night, that hasn’t gone right into Sean Casey’s glove, with a minimum of effort from Sean Casey.

    That makes a big difference.

    Essentially the Reds have decided that they would prefer to have their games lost by the SS (if that’s going to be the case) in other situations that don’t involve throws. It’s as if they have decided that that flaw in Lopez’s game trumps all the other flaws in Aurilia’s game.

    It’s a gamble that I think they’ll lose (if “winning” is the goal (over development) The 1982 White Sox had the same problem with their 3rd baseman Jim Morrison, who had a scatter arm. They went out and got Aurilio Rodriguez for his arm and let that trump all the other parts of his game that were finished.

    Just Like the Reds did with Terry Pendelton in the late 90’s.

    The 2 strike approach of Aurilia is fine, but his general AB approach is hardly world beater or alway “professional” by nature. He is a swinger with an aversion to taking a walk. The classic free swinger who works the count maybe once or twice every 10 AB’s, thus pushing his Pitches seen up… all the while making you forget his 2 1st pitch outs earlier in that game.

  2. I just found a trade partner for a Danny Graves deal – The San Fran Giants just lost their closer for 4 months!

  3. If anyone wants a shot at Graves – its probably going to be the Yankees. However, the Yankees really don’t have anyone else to deal.

    Danny’s here through the end of the year – and will leave via FA.

  4. It’s not like there is a team of rookies out there. You have veterans at each position, except perhaps RF if you want to say Kearns/Pena are not yet veterans. Play Lopez, bat him 8th and let him take his knocks. It is very debatable that Aurilia brings you more wins than Lopez. It could be argued that Lopez will bring more wins AND get the experience he needs. I’d rather see Lopez play this year, so that the entire left side of the infield in 2006 is not inexperienced.

  5. I disagree w/ the Reds braintrust that Aurilia would outperform Lopez this year. I agree with Greg that you can contend AND introduce a young player. Good teams do it — the Braves have been doing it for a decade (Chipper, Giles, Andrew Jones, Furcal, LaRoche, all started as rookies for contending clubs).

    Awesome interview, and thanks to Marc for participating.

  6. At this rate – maybe we trade Aurilia to the Devil Rays????? Where else can you get a $600,000 shortstop?

    BTW – FYI- Juan Castro’s numbers in Minnesota – 5/19 with one RBI. Plays every third day it seems. (according to Yahoo!)

  7. Not the D-Ray’s. I like them too. Don’t dump him on them. Plus Lou loves Lugo. They don’t want another SS.

  8. There must be a certain thing about the Devil Rays – I actually find myself watching the game on my MLB Extra Innings package – if I can’t get the Reds. I do own a Rays hat – I think it was for me a Lou thing – but with Huff, Crawford, Baldelli (when he returns), and Kazmir, they may have something cooking in Tampa Bay.

    Of course, the Dayton Dragons outdraw them on most nights….

  9. Funny you guys should say that. I feel the same way about the Rays. For years, the only AL team I followed was the Tigers (mainly because of Sparky).

    Now, I follow the Rays, and I find myself watching them on Extra Innings, too. Part of it is that I went to a Rays game last year while I was in Florida. Also, the brother of a friend pitches for them.

    They’re fun to follow, but I couldn’t handle being a real fan of the team. Their management is much worse than the Reds. Must be maddening to root for them.

  10. It is maddening. I’m first and foremost a Red’s fan. But the D-Rays are in town, so I follow them close. They have a great minor league system. Much better than the Reds, but the owner won’t spend anything. Plus he’s a jerk.

    Then they mismanage their players and have done little right at the major league level.

  11. I’ve got 4 tickets on June 9th when the Rays invade Cincinnati – I was hoping that was Lou Pinella Base Tossing night.

    BTW – Facination with the Devil Rays is not like facination with the Arizona Cardinals or the Los Angeles Clippers. The Devil Rays actually look like they care.

    I’m still trying to imagine Robhy Alomar at 2b with this club – and it looks like they miss Rocco.

    As long as the Rays are in the AL East-Third place would be like a World Series win.

Comments are closed.