The Nation on Twitter! Facebook!

Pulse of the Nation

What must the Reds accomplish for Dusty to return as manager as 2011?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Most Loyal Citizens of The Nation

  1. pinson343 (229)
  2. TC (200)
  3. hoosierdad (198)
  4. BJ Ruble (186)
  5. preach (182)
  6. RiverCity Redleg (150)
  7. Travis G. (139)
  8. david (117)
  9. Matt WI (108)
  10. RedinFla (99)
  11. Mark in CC (86)
  12. nick in va (84)
  13. JasonL (70)
  14. JustTheFacts (60)
  15. Luke Price (57)
  16. Glenn (55)
  17. Steve (53)
  18. al (50)
  19. GRF (50)
  20. Sultan of Swaff (46)
  21. Kevin Mitchell is... (34)
  22. The Mad Hatter (34)
  23. World (32)
  24. John (31)
  25. Dan (30)

Archives

Giants and EE match?

John Fay is reporting:

–Heard from a reliable source today that the Giants are interested in the Edwin Encarnacion. I think Encarnacion is the most likely Red to be traded for two reasons: He’s got high-value and the Reds are deep in the minors at third base.

No mention on what they might be offering.

10 comments to Giants and EE match?

  • Y-City Jim

    and who would play 3B for the Reds?

    ReplyReply
  • mhopp

    Don’t worry, Dusty is making some calls

    ReplyReply
  • Jose

    yeah
    if we;re lucky they will call brandon larson
    he would be a steal for only a few million

    ReplyReply
  • rob in stl

    EE for Jonathan Sanchez? It would likely be pitching in return.

    ReplyReply
  • Jose

    i can only wish for sanchez
    unlikely though
    cause EE isnt that valuable

    ReplyReply
  • Mr. Redlegs

    EE is that valuable to a team that badly needs offense, a 3b, and has some excess pitching. The Reds and Giants match up pretty well and if Uncle Walt and Sabean wanted to expand the deal to include Burriss or Lewis, that could fast track the Reds to where 2009 wild-card contention might not be out of the question.

    3b can filled easier than getting that lefthanded pitcher they desperately need, that ss of the future, or even that lead-off hitting OF.

    Trading as asset (EE) for an asset of greater need makes some sense.

    ReplyReply
  • Jose

    we wont get much cause we’re the reds
    we always get the short end of a deal

    ReplyReply
  • Y-City Jim

    Trading as asset (EE) for an asset of greater need makes some sense.

    That’s the key criteria of any deal.

    ReplyReply
  • rob in stl

    With Renteria locked up for 2 years Burriss doesn’t have a spot to play, unless the Giants move him to second. The Reds need a shortstop, wj has said he wants a 0-3 guy if he acquires a ss…..hmmm possible blockbust with the Giants? If his Cardinal tenure is any indication Jocketty will improve the Reds up the middle. That means another catcher and a shortstop. The Reds have too many holes to fill. Somewhere the club will just have to make do with a fill in type player. I’d rather that spot be 3rd base than shortstop.

    ReplyReply
  • David

    Don’t forget Molina. He may be the type of catcher that Jocketty has in mind.

    ReplyReply

You must be logged in to post a comment.