<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dusty Baker and OBP, again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/</link>
	<description>A Cincinnati Reds Blog &#124; Dishing out hot, creamy bowls of bloggy goodness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:54:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-823328</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-823328</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t substitute high AVG and OBP when you&#039;re arguing against Dusty&#039;s &quot;I want guys to hit, not just get on base.&quot;

Even if Dusty isn&#039;t a good fit, he&#039;s still a better manager than we&#039;re used to. Lets enjoy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t substitute high AVG and OBP when you&#8217;re arguing against Dusty&#8217;s &#8220;I want guys to hit, not just get on base.&#8221;</p>
<p>Even if Dusty isn&#8217;t a good fit, he&#8217;s still a better manager than we&#8217;re used to. Lets enjoy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: preach</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-821352</link>
		<dc:creator>preach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-821352</guid>
		<description>However it&#039;s defined, by my scenario give me the base clogger to tie with the power guy to follow. And unless it&#039;s still early April, that guy with the .000 average is not on my bench. He&#039;s on a minor league one somewhere. I understand the point, but I still say give me the base clogger in hopes of getting the guy from third home. Most know I&#039;m a small-ball fan, so high OBP is fine with me (nice rhyme). Feel free to substitutute OBP for AVG in my scenario. I&#039;m still going to use the same guy first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However it&#8217;s defined, by my scenario give me the base clogger to tie with the power guy to follow. And unless it&#8217;s still early April, that guy with the .000 average is not on my bench. He&#8217;s on a minor league one somewhere. I understand the point, but I still say give me the base clogger in hopes of getting the guy from third home. Most know I&#8217;m a small-ball fan, so high OBP is fine with me (nice rhyme). Feel free to substitutute OBP for AVG in my scenario. I&#8217;m still going to use the same guy first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-821324</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-821324</guid>
		<description>preach -- we&#039;re not talking high AVG here. It&#039;s high OBP. 

I&#039;ll go a little extreme here, but lets say whoever doesn&#039;t get the AB in your scenario is going to bat after him. Guy A has a .500 OBP and a .000 AVG. Guy B has a .250 OBP and AVG. Who are you going with?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>preach &#8212; we&#8217;re not talking high AVG here. It&#8217;s high OBP. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll go a little extreme here, but lets say whoever doesn&#8217;t get the AB in your scenario is going to bat after him. Guy A has a .500 OBP and a .000 AVG. Guy B has a .250 OBP and AVG. Who are you going with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: preach</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-821260</link>
		<dc:creator>preach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-821260</guid>
		<description>I agree, Chris. I was always taught it was a good thing to get on base. Anytime you have runners on it&#039;s a good thing. Of course it makes double plays more likely, but it makes big innings more likely as well. Let me pose this scenario: Bottom of the ninth, down by a run, two outs, runner on third. You look down your bench and you have two options: Power hitter wih low average, or &#039;base clogger&#039; with high average. Both have good RBI totals. Assuming they both hit from the same side of the plate and neither has faced the opposing pitcher during their careers, who do you send to the plate? Me, give me a base clogger to tie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Chris. I was always taught it was a good thing to get on base. Anytime you have runners on it&#8217;s a good thing. Of course it makes double plays more likely, but it makes big innings more likely as well. Let me pose this scenario: Bottom of the ninth, down by a run, two outs, runner on third. You look down your bench and you have two options: Power hitter wih low average, or &#8216;base clogger&#8217; with high average. Both have good RBI totals. Assuming they both hit from the same side of the plate and neither has faced the opposing pitcher during their careers, who do you send to the plate? Me, give me a base clogger to tie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-821198</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-821198</guid>
		<description>Somebody, somewhere explain to me how the &quot;clogging the bases&quot; thing makes a damn lick of sense.  (And this is twice now that he&#039;s said it -- it&#039;s not an accident).

&quot;Your job in the middle is to either score them or drive them in. The name of the game is scoring runs.  Sometimes, you get so caught up in on-base percentage that you’re clogging up the bases.” 

I get the first part.  Don&#039;t agree, but I understand what he&#039;s saying.  

But that &quot;clogging&quot; comment just can&#039;t be ignored.  Not twice.  Baker is explicitly saying that he&#039;d prefer an out to a walk, at least in some circumstances.  There&#039;s really no other interpretation to the sentence.  

I understand that he&#039;d rather have a hit (really an extra-base hit) than a walk.  I get that part.  But the &quot;clogging&quot; comment says that there&#039;s something &lt;em&gt;wrong &lt;/em&gt;simply with being on base, at least for (presumably slow) sluggers, and in some sort of circumstances.

He&#039;s saying that he&#039;d rather not have those baserunners, which is just a crazy thing to say, since the only alternative to &quot;being on base&quot; is &quot;being out.&quot;  

There is simply no circumstance where this is true.  Imagine the slowest batter ever, with Sean Casey up next - yeah, there&#039;s a good chance of a double-play, but there&#039;s also &lt;em&gt;some&lt;/em&gt; chance of a two-run jack.  Slowest player ever, with Ty Cobb up next - yeah, there&#039;s a chance that Cobb has to stop at 2nd on a sure triple, but is &quot;2nd &amp; 3rd, 0 outs&quot; somehow worse than &quot;man on 3rd, 1 out&quot;?

I actually don&#039;t think Baker truly believes the clogging statement, but &lt;strong&gt;he&#039;s said it twice now&lt;/strong&gt;, and frankly, just saying it is dumb enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somebody, somewhere explain to me how the &#8220;clogging the bases&#8221; thing makes a damn lick of sense.  (And this is twice now that he&#8217;s said it &#8212; it&#8217;s not an accident).</p>
<p>&#8220;Your job in the middle is to either score them or drive them in. The name of the game is scoring runs.  Sometimes, you get so caught up in on-base percentage that you’re clogging up the bases.” </p>
<p>I get the first part.  Don&#8217;t agree, but I understand what he&#8217;s saying.  </p>
<p>But that &#8220;clogging&#8221; comment just can&#8217;t be ignored.  Not twice.  Baker is explicitly saying that he&#8217;d prefer an out to a walk, at least in some circumstances.  There&#8217;s really no other interpretation to the sentence.  </p>
<p>I understand that he&#8217;d rather have a hit (really an extra-base hit) than a walk.  I get that part.  But the &#8220;clogging&#8221; comment says that there&#8217;s something <em>wrong </em>simply with being on base, at least for (presumably slow) sluggers, and in some sort of circumstances.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s saying that he&#8217;d rather not have those baserunners, which is just a crazy thing to say, since the only alternative to &#8220;being on base&#8221; is &#8220;being out.&#8221;  </p>
<p>There is simply no circumstance where this is true.  Imagine the slowest batter ever, with Sean Casey up next &#8211; yeah, there&#8217;s a good chance of a double-play, but there&#8217;s also <em>some</em> chance of a two-run jack.  Slowest player ever, with Ty Cobb up next &#8211; yeah, there&#8217;s a chance that Cobb has to stop at 2nd on a sure triple, but is &#8220;2nd &#038; 3rd, 0 outs&#8221; somehow worse than &#8220;man on 3rd, 1 out&#8221;?</p>
<p>I actually don&#8217;t think Baker truly believes the clogging statement, but <strong>he&#8217;s said it twice now</strong>, and frankly, just saying it is dumb enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-821159</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-821159</guid>
		<description>&quot;In approximately the same number of PA, Dunn knocked in 50 less runs, but yet scored 100 more runs.&quot;

Yeah. He plays on a team with low OBP (which accounts for his lower RBIs) and hit almost exactly 100 more homeruns in your sample.

&quot;Maybe if they weren’t so one dimensional and increased their OBP skills, they could have scored runs at the same rate as Adam Dunn, who already knocks in nearly as many runs as them, and helped the team score runs even more.&quot;

This is a function of Adam Dunn&#039;s power and nothing else. Sure, he&#039;s a genius because he&#039;s put genuine effort in to getting on base more often. But (1) what else is a guy in his position (ya know -- already hitting tons of homeruns) going to do? And (2) he&#039;s &lt;em&gt;given&lt;/em&gt; a whole lot of walks that most people can&#039;t hope for.

I&#039;ll go on record now as saying people just don&#039;t want to like Dusty. I don&#039;t either, but listen to what he&#039;s saying. He&#039;s saying people are placing too much value on the OBP stat, to which people reply with more stats. 

If you&#039;ve got a guy on first and no one will swing the bat, not too many guys are gonna score.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In approximately the same number of PA, Dunn knocked in 50 less runs, but yet scored 100 more runs.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah. He plays on a team with low OBP (which accounts for his lower RBIs) and hit almost exactly 100 more homeruns in your sample.</p>
<p>&#8220;Maybe if they weren’t so one dimensional and increased their OBP skills, they could have scored runs at the same rate as Adam Dunn, who already knocks in nearly as many runs as them, and helped the team score runs even more.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is a function of Adam Dunn&#8217;s power and nothing else. Sure, he&#8217;s a genius because he&#8217;s put genuine effort in to getting on base more often. But (1) what else is a guy in his position (ya know &#8212; already hitting tons of homeruns) going to do? And (2) he&#8217;s <em>given</em> a whole lot of walks that most people can&#8217;t hope for.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll go on record now as saying people just don&#8217;t want to like Dusty. I don&#8217;t either, but listen to what he&#8217;s saying. He&#8217;s saying people are placing too much value on the OBP stat, to which people reply with more stats. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve got a guy on first and no one will swing the bat, not too many guys are gonna score.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legend</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-821036</link>
		<dc:creator>Legend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-821036</guid>
		<description>Is Adam Dunn, Pat Burrell?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Adam Dunn, Pat Burrell?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerm</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-820789</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-820789</guid>
		<description>Along those same lines Mike my high school coach would always tell us pitchers that walks kill.  So throw that in there as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Along those same lines Mike my high school coach would always tell us pitchers that walks kill.  So throw that in there as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Martz</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-820642</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Martz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-820642</guid>
		<description>Weren&#039;t we all told in little league that a walk was as good as a hit???? :shock:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weren&#8217;t we all told in little league that a walk was as good as a hit???? <img src='http://redlegnation.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_eek.gif' alt=':shock:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GodlyCynic</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-819943</link>
		<dc:creator>GodlyCynic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 03:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-819943</guid>
		<description>Ummm...the Red Sox did hire an older stats nerd (Bill James) and a younger stats nerd (Theo Epstein) and managed to win two World Series rather recently with that combination.  Damn those stats nerds and their lack of results!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummm&#8230;the Red Sox did hire an older stats nerd (Bill James) and a younger stats nerd (Theo Epstein) and managed to win two World Series rather recently with that combination.  Damn those stats nerds and their lack of results!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: preach</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-819932</link>
		<dc:creator>preach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 03:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-819932</guid>
		<description>Get &#039;em on, get &#039;em over, get &#039;em in. I don&#039;t care how you do it, four walks or a solo shot, it still counts as a run. I think baserunners cause a pitcher to lose rythm just like giving up gopher balls. Home runs score right now, walks and singles score eventually and wear a pitcher down. I don&#039;t care how you do it, just score more than the other team. I love &#039;old school&#039; batting average, RBI, and runs scored. I have recently adopted a love of OBP. Bottom line: if just one of those categories is really high, I want you to come to the plate with runners on base. Don&#039;t really care which one. Get &#039;em on, get &#039;em over, get &#039;em in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get &#8216;em on, get &#8216;em over, get &#8216;em in. I don&#8217;t care how you do it, four walks or a solo shot, it still counts as a run. I think baserunners cause a pitcher to lose rythm just like giving up gopher balls. Home runs score right now, walks and singles score eventually and wear a pitcher down. I don&#8217;t care how you do it, just score more than the other team. I love &#8216;old school&#8217; batting average, RBI, and runs scored. I have recently adopted a love of OBP. Bottom line: if just one of those categories is really high, I want you to come to the plate with runners on base. Don&#8217;t really care which one. Get &#8216;em on, get &#8216;em over, get &#8216;em in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-819906</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 03:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-819906</guid>
		<description>Lol Chad.

All &#039;stats nerds&#039; are trying to do is find more correct ways to identify how and why a team/player does how it does. Why did they win? Why did they lose? Why did they score this many or allow this many runs? Is there a way to correct that flaw with the current team at hand? 

Thats all us &#039;stats nerds&#039; are trying to do. I always enjoy my excel spreadsheets when I learn something new, or find something that explains why a player/team may have a much better season this time around. Nerd... I can deal with that. At least someone didn&#039;t call me stupid, at that point it at least would have been insulting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol Chad.</p>
<p>All &#8217;stats nerds&#8217; are trying to do is find more correct ways to identify how and why a team/player does how it does. Why did they win? Why did they lose? Why did they score this many or allow this many runs? Is there a way to correct that flaw with the current team at hand? </p>
<p>Thats all us &#8217;stats nerds&#8217; are trying to do. I always enjoy my excel spreadsheets when I learn something new, or find something that explains why a player/team may have a much better season this time around. Nerd&#8230; I can deal with that. At least someone didn&#8217;t call me stupid, at that point it at least would have been insulting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-819901</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 03:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-819901</guid>
		<description>I read sometime about an interesting experiment that Bill James did.  He simulated 1000&#039;s of games involving Babe Ruth...  

In one set of games the opponent just pitched to Babe as usual.  In the other set, they intentionally walked him every single at bat.

He found that the Babe&#039;s team scored more runs when he was walked every time -- and that was true (by far) when he was surrounded by a lineup of real 1927 Yankee teammates, and it was even true when he was surrounded by a pretty lame lineup.  (I don&#039;t remember the exact details here.)

It&#039;s a totally weird, extreme comparison, of course, but it illustrates a point.

The goal isn&#039;t just walks.  It&#039;s runs.  And getting baserunners and NOT making outs leads to a lot of runs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read sometime about an interesting experiment that Bill James did.  He simulated 1000&#8217;s of games involving Babe Ruth&#8230;  </p>
<p>In one set of games the opponent just pitched to Babe as usual.  In the other set, they intentionally walked him every single at bat.</p>
<p>He found that the Babe&#8217;s team scored more runs when he was walked every time &#8212; and that was true (by far) when he was surrounded by a lineup of real 1927 Yankee teammates, and it was even true when he was surrounded by a pretty lame lineup.  (I don&#8217;t remember the exact details here.)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a totally weird, extreme comparison, of course, but it illustrates a point.</p>
<p>The goal isn&#8217;t just walks.  It&#8217;s runs.  And getting baserunners and NOT making outs leads to a lot of runs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-819838</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 02:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-819838</guid>
		<description>Sheesh.  

I&#039;m convinced.  Everything Dusty Baker says is the gospel.  It&#039;s impossible that he might be incorrect about anything.  After all, he&#039;s a 30 year veteran and proven winner.

I&#039;ll be shutting down the blog later tonight, or tomorrow.  Clearly, we can&#039;t  discuss anything about baseball because we are &quot;STATS nerds&quot; who couldn&#039;t possibly be correct about anything unless we agree 100% with everything Reds management tells us to believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sheesh.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m convinced.  Everything Dusty Baker says is the gospel.  It&#8217;s impossible that he might be incorrect about anything.  After all, he&#8217;s a 30 year veteran and proven winner.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be shutting down the blog later tonight, or tomorrow.  Clearly, we can&#8217;t  discuss anything about baseball because we are &#8220;STATS nerds&#8221; who couldn&#8217;t possibly be correct about anything unless we agree 100% with everything Reds management tells us to believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-819775</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 02:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2008/02/24/dusty-baker-and-obp-again/#comment-819775</guid>
		<description>Ted Williams sucked!!!  All those friggen walks.  Guy should&#039;ve swung at more lousy pitches.  A few more popouts would&#039;ve proved his dedication to the team.  

I&#039;ll be back in my parents&#039; basement.  Somebody yell when the season starts -- not the games themselves, because I don&#039;t watch those -- just let me know when the stats show up online, cause that&#039;s all I care about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted Williams sucked!!!  All those friggen walks.  Guy should&#8217;ve swung at more lousy pitches.  A few more popouts would&#8217;ve proved his dedication to the team.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be back in my parents&#8217; basement.  Somebody yell when the season starts &#8212; not the games themselves, because I don&#8217;t watch those &#8212; just let me know when the stats show up online, cause that&#8217;s all I care about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
