<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Carroll on Homer Bailey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/</link>
	<description>A Cincinnati Reds Blog &#124; Dishing out hot, creamy bowls of bloggy goodness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GregD</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-287425</link>
		<dc:creator>GregD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 20:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-287425</guid>
		<description>Maddux was a far cry from Maddux his rookie season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maddux was a far cry from Maddux his rookie season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-287416</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 20:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-287416</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;He is a far cry from Maddux, and certainly has not shown the flashes of dominance we’d hope for. &lt;/em&gt;

I&#039;d venture to say that 100% of major league rookies are &quot;a far cry from Maddux.&quot;  As for the other statement, I&#039;m not sure I need to see &quot;flashes of dominance&quot; in Bailey&#039;s first six starts - but I think I have.  That high fastball has blown away some fair hitters, like Eric Chavez, Stephen Drew, and Grady Sizemore (the 3 guys who&#039;ve struck out multiple times vs. Homer).  He&#039;s a long way from being a major league stud, but we need to keep things in perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>He is a far cry from Maddux, and certainly has not shown the flashes of dominance we’d hope for. </em></p>
<p>I&#8217;d venture to say that 100% of major league rookies are &#8220;a far cry from Maddux.&#8221;  As for the other statement, I&#8217;m not sure I need to see &#8220;flashes of dominance&#8221; in Bailey&#8217;s first six starts &#8211; but I think I have.  That high fastball has blown away some fair hitters, like Eric Chavez, Stephen Drew, and Grady Sizemore (the 3 guys who&#8217;ve struck out multiple times vs. Homer).  He&#8217;s a long way from being a major league stud, but we need to keep things in perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GregD</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-287383</link>
		<dc:creator>GregD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 20:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-287383</guid>
		<description>I think he finished the first half on a good note.  Only allowed hits in one of his five innings of work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think he finished the first half on a good note.  Only allowed hits in one of his five innings of work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave E.</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-287318</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 19:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-287318</guid>
		<description>I was at the last Bailey start -- he was topping out at 94 on the scoreboard, usually in the 90-91 range.

Bailey has not been impressive so far.  I have seen all his starts on the road that were televised and the home ones live.  His fastball is pretty good even in the low 90&#039;s, will a little tailing movement away from left handers.  His change is decent but erratic and not a ML pitch yet.  Same for the curve, but worse.  His arm action on the curve is weirdly slow, tipping the pitch.  He is a far cry from Maddux, and certainly has not shown the flashes of dominance we&#039;d hope for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was at the last Bailey start &#8212; he was topping out at 94 on the scoreboard, usually in the 90-91 range.</p>
<p>Bailey has not been impressive so far.  I have seen all his starts on the road that were televised and the home ones live.  His fastball is pretty good even in the low 90&#8217;s, will a little tailing movement away from left handers.  His change is decent but erratic and not a ML pitch yet.  Same for the curve, but worse.  His arm action on the curve is weirdly slow, tipping the pitch.  He is a far cry from Maddux, and certainly has not shown the flashes of dominance we&#8217;d hope for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Carroll</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-279320</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Carroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 19:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-279320</guid>
		<description>Rick&#039;s right ... I&#039;m not as well sourced as Gammons, or Stark. Ringolsby? Nah, not him either. I&#039;m a niche guy who talks to a lot of people. Credentialed? Sure, with most teams, though the Reds aren&#039;t one of them. I bought a ticket like everyone to go down and see Griffey and Bonds play Tuesday. I don&#039;t have Gammons&#039; experience, but I work hard at what I do. Perfect? Far from it, but dismissing me as a &quot;fantasy geek&quot; is far from true. Remember Rick ... I work at ESPN too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick&#8217;s right &#8230; I&#8217;m not as well sourced as Gammons, or Stark. Ringolsby? Nah, not him either. I&#8217;m a niche guy who talks to a lot of people. Credentialed? Sure, with most teams, though the Reds aren&#8217;t one of them. I bought a ticket like everyone to go down and see Griffey and Bonds play Tuesday. I don&#8217;t have Gammons&#8217; experience, but I work hard at what I do. Perfect? Far from it, but dismissing me as a &#8220;fantasy geek&#8221; is far from true. Remember Rick &#8230; I work at ESPN too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-278285</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 03:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-278285</guid>
		<description>Well, Rick, if you&#039;ve got your mind made up I can&#039;t help you....but I don&#039;t know of any GM or trainer that will take my calls, or yours either.  Most if not all of them take Will&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Rick, if you&#8217;ve got your mind made up I can&#8217;t help you&#8230;.but I don&#8217;t know of any GM or trainer that will take my calls, or yours either.  Most if not all of them take Will&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Rizzuto Parmesan</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-277676</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Rizzuto Parmesan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 22:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-277676</guid>
		<description>Jesus, here I go again...

&lt;em&gt;And yet Gammons and McCoy are in the Hall of Fame &lt;/em&gt;

If you mean the Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, m]neither are in the hall.  We&#039;ve been through this before.  Sportswriters and broadcasters cannot be inductees into the Hall per HoF rules.  From the HoF website:

&lt;em&gt;The J.G. Taylor Spink Award, named after the late editor of The Sporting News, has been voted upon annually since 1962 when Spink himself was the recipient of the inaugural honor. The award honors a baseball writer (or writers) &quot;for meritorious contributions to baseball writing&quot; and is presented at the Hall of Fame Induction Ceremony by that year&#039;s President of the Baseball Writers&#039; Association of America (BBWAA).

The award is voted upon annually by the BBWAA, via a meeting and subsequent &quot;show of hands&quot; either at the preceding year&#039;s World Series or Winter Meetings. A nominee is recommended by the BBWAA&#039;s Screening Committee prior to the meeting. Each award recipient &lt;b&gt;(not to be confused with an inductee)&lt;/b&gt; is presented with a certificate during the Hall of Fame Induction Ceremony and is recognized in the &quot;Scribes &amp; Mikemen&quot; exhibit in the Library of the National Baseball Hall of Fame.&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://web.baseballhalloffame.org/hofers/spink.jsp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This page&lt;/a&gt; provides the relevant text and the list of honorees.  McCoy was honored in 2002; Gammons in 2004.  There is a similar page with relevant text for Ford Frick Award winners like Marty.

But even if your shorthand were correct, it&#039;s a straw man.  There is no relationship between being an honored sportswriter and being right.  And while I&#039;d like to think Gammons&#039; age gives him a special status (since we are contemporaries), it doesn&#039;t.  In fact, it wouldn&#039;t surprise me to see Gammo pick up on this - he&#039;s referenced Carroll and B-Pro in the past - and report it in his ESPN blog next week. (In all fairness, Peter has done a good job of getting  the basic of modern statistical analysis disseminated to the wider fan audience.)

All you are showing is a bias to given source because that source meets your personal definition of acceptable.  It&#039;s like saying you believe something because Britt Hume said so on Fox News but don&#039;t believe the same thing because Jim Lehrer said it on PBS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus, here I go again&#8230;</p>
<p><em>And yet Gammons and McCoy are in the Hall of Fame </em></p>
<p>If you mean the Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, m]neither are in the hall.  We&#8217;ve been through this before.  Sportswriters and broadcasters cannot be inductees into the Hall per HoF rules.  From the HoF website:</p>
<p><em>The J.G. Taylor Spink Award, named after the late editor of The Sporting News, has been voted upon annually since 1962 when Spink himself was the recipient of the inaugural honor. The award honors a baseball writer (or writers) &#8220;for meritorious contributions to baseball writing&#8221; and is presented at the Hall of Fame Induction Ceremony by that year&#8217;s President of the Baseball Writers&#8217; Association of America (BBWAA).</p>
<p>The award is voted upon annually by the BBWAA, via a meeting and subsequent &#8220;show of hands&#8221; either at the preceding year&#8217;s World Series or Winter Meetings. A nominee is recommended by the BBWAA&#8217;s Screening Committee prior to the meeting. Each award recipient <b>(not to be confused with an inductee)</b> is presented with a certificate during the Hall of Fame Induction Ceremony and is recognized in the &#8220;Scribes &amp; Mikemen&#8221; exhibit in the Library of the National Baseball Hall of Fame.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://web.baseballhalloffame.org/hofers/spink.jsp" rel="nofollow">This page</a> provides the relevant text and the list of honorees.  McCoy was honored in 2002; Gammons in 2004.  There is a similar page with relevant text for Ford Frick Award winners like Marty.</p>
<p>But even if your shorthand were correct, it&#8217;s a straw man.  There is no relationship between being an honored sportswriter and being right.  And while I&#8217;d like to think Gammons&#8217; age gives him a special status (since we are contemporaries), it doesn&#8217;t.  In fact, it wouldn&#8217;t surprise me to see Gammo pick up on this &#8211; he&#8217;s referenced Carroll and B-Pro in the past &#8211; and report it in his ESPN blog next week. (In all fairness, Peter has done a good job of getting  the basic of modern statistical analysis disseminated to the wider fan audience.)</p>
<p>All you are showing is a bias to given source because that source meets your personal definition of acceptable.  It&#8217;s like saying you believe something because Britt Hume said so on Fox News but don&#8217;t believe the same thing because Jim Lehrer said it on PBS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-277118</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 19:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-277118</guid>
		<description>-Rick-

I think you&#039;d be surprised with the access Will gets from teams. But I&#039;ll leave that to him to explain if he chooses.

Still doesn&#039;t explain the ridiculous opposition to him.

It&#039;s more information we can have as fans and do with as we please. We can believe everything he says as gospel or we can disregard everything because he doesn&#039;t have BBWAA tag some want him to.

Or we could take the information he provides, along with the many other sources out there, and use it to inform our own opinions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-Rick-</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;d be surprised with the access Will gets from teams. But I&#8217;ll leave that to him to explain if he chooses.</p>
<p>Still doesn&#8217;t explain the ridiculous opposition to him.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s more information we can have as fans and do with as we please. We can believe everything he says as gospel or we can disregard everything because he doesn&#8217;t have BBWAA tag some want him to.</p>
<p>Or we could take the information he provides, along with the many other sources out there, and use it to inform our own opinions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rickNmd</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-277091</link>
		<dc:creator>rickNmd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 18:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-277091</guid>
		<description>And yet Gammons and McCoy are in the Hall of Fame and is Carroll even a credentialed member of the media? Does he get into games and the clubhouses as a member of the media? 

Otherwise, he&#039;s no different than us blogheads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And yet Gammons and McCoy are in the Hall of Fame and is Carroll even a credentialed member of the media? Does he get into games and the clubhouses as a member of the media? </p>
<p>Otherwise, he&#8217;s no different than us blogheads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-277004</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 17:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-277004</guid>
		<description>Doug, I read that thread, and it was a far cry from the &quot;head to head&quot; debunking you described.  I&#039;d call it a &quot;healthy discussion&quot; where a doc corrected a couple uses of terminology, but that&#039;s about it.  

Carroll knows what he&#039;s talking about, even if I don&#039;t dig the cryptic nature of the Bailey warning.  (It makes it hard to know whether Will&#039;s being vague due to source considerations, or b/c he doesn&#039;t have a source and is basing his opinion on his own observations - either one is probably a valid basis for the warning, but they aren&#039;t the same, and being so vague invites skepticism).

And yeah, Rick&#039;s comment at #23 was pretty silly - as if accurate information can only be transmitted through the prism of 40-year veteran writers.  Some reporters/writers are good, and some aren&#039;t.  Some veteran writers are lazy, and some aren&#039;t.  And they &lt;strong&gt;all&lt;/strong&gt; end up reporting nonsense from time to time.  (Or, I could&#039;ve short-cut that entire paragraph by just saying, &quot;Hal McCoy.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug, I read that thread, and it was a far cry from the &#8220;head to head&#8221; debunking you described.  I&#8217;d call it a &#8220;healthy discussion&#8221; where a doc corrected a couple uses of terminology, but that&#8217;s about it.  </p>
<p>Carroll knows what he&#8217;s talking about, even if I don&#8217;t dig the cryptic nature of the Bailey warning.  (It makes it hard to know whether Will&#8217;s being vague due to source considerations, or b/c he doesn&#8217;t have a source and is basing his opinion on his own observations &#8211; either one is probably a valid basis for the warning, but they aren&#8217;t the same, and being so vague invites skepticism).</p>
<p>And yeah, Rick&#8217;s comment at #23 was pretty silly &#8211; as if accurate information can only be transmitted through the prism of 40-year veteran writers.  Some reporters/writers are good, and some aren&#8217;t.  Some veteran writers are lazy, and some aren&#8217;t.  And they <strong>all</strong> end up reporting nonsense from time to time.  (Or, I could&#8217;ve short-cut that entire paragraph by just saying, &#8220;Hal McCoy.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt B.</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-276985</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 17:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-276985</guid>
		<description>Jayson Stark has said a lot of NL scouts are surprised about the lack of life on Bailey&#039;s fastball.  I&#039;m not sure what to believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jayson Stark has said a lot of NL scouts are surprised about the lack of life on Bailey&#8217;s fastball.  I&#8217;m not sure what to believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-276974</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 17:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-276974</guid>
		<description>http://mvn.com/mlb-cubs/2007/04/26/deja-vu-all-over-again/

There you go Will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mvn.com/mlb-cubs/2007/04/26/deja-vu-all-over-again/" rel="nofollow">http://mvn.com/mlb-cubs/2007/04/26/deja-vu-all-over-again/</a></p>
<p>There you go Will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChicagoRedsFan</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-276961</link>
		<dc:creator>ChicagoRedsFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 17:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-276961</guid>
		<description>I realize that is very easy to second guess bringing Homer up this soon, but I really didn&#039;t understand what the rush was at the time.  I would have been much more comfortable just waiting at least until after the All-Star break.  His control wasn&#039;t very good in Louisville (24 walks in 58 innings).  Shouldn&#039;t we have waited until his walk counts went down?  4 walks per 9 innings in AAA is not good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize that is very easy to second guess bringing Homer up this soon, but I really didn&#8217;t understand what the rush was at the time.  I would have been much more comfortable just waiting at least until after the All-Star break.  His control wasn&#8217;t very good in Louisville (24 walks in 58 innings).  Shouldn&#8217;t we have waited until his walk counts went down?  4 walks per 9 innings in AAA is not good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rickNmd</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-276941</link>
		<dc:creator>rickNmd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 17:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-276941</guid>
		<description>Shawn, I have no problem with what you posted as long as some fantasy bozo isn&#039;t trying to tell me Carroll is better sourced than Gammons, Stark, Ringolsby or even Rosenthal. Those guys have been inside the game and reporting on the game for top-tier publications for more than 100 years combined.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shawn, I have no problem with what you posted as long as some fantasy bozo isn&#8217;t trying to tell me Carroll is better sourced than Gammons, Stark, Ringolsby or even Rosenthal. Those guys have been inside the game and reporting on the game for top-tier publications for more than 100 years combined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-276930</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redlegnation.com/2007/07/03/will-carroll-on-homer-bailey/#comment-276930</guid>
		<description>Heh.  Looks like you got Will&#039;s attention.  Rick, you don&#039;t know Will Carroll, so don&#039;t pretend you do.  He is NOT &quot;some fantasy nerd behind a computer.&quot;  He is a former college pitcher, whose dad is an orthopedic surgeon, with sources that match anyone this side of Gammons.  And when I say he knows everyone, he does.  I mean, Will Carroll knows ME.  How far down the list is this humble Reds&#039; blogger?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh.  Looks like you got Will&#8217;s attention.  Rick, you don&#8217;t know Will Carroll, so don&#8217;t pretend you do.  He is NOT &#8220;some fantasy nerd behind a computer.&#8221;  He is a former college pitcher, whose dad is an orthopedic surgeon, with sources that match anyone this side of Gammons.  And when I say he knows everyone, he does.  I mean, Will Carroll knows ME.  How far down the list is this humble Reds&#8217; blogger?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
