The Nation on Twitter! Facebook!

Pulse of the Nation

What must the Reds accomplish for Dusty to return as manager as 2011?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Most Loyal Citizens of The Nation

  1. pinson343 (237)
  2. hoosierdad (202)
  3. TC (200)
  4. BJ Ruble (186)
  5. preach (182)
  6. RiverCity Redleg (150)
  7. Travis G. (139)
  8. david (117)
  9. Matt WI (108)
  10. RedinFla (99)
  11. Mark in CC (86)
  12. nick in va (84)
  13. JasonL (70)
  14. JustTheFacts (60)
  15. Luke Price (57)
  16. Glenn (56)
  17. Steve (53)
  18. al (50)
  19. GRF (50)
  20. Sultan of Swaff (46)
  21. Kevin Mitchell is... (34)
  22. The Mad Hatter (34)
  23. World (32)
  24. John (31)
  25. Dan (30)

Archives

No more WLW?

Are WLW’s days numbered as the home of the Reds? Andy Furman suggests that that is a possibility.

I just can’t imagine that would ever happen, but when the parent company gets involved, things tend to get messy.

7 comments to No more WLW?

  • Chris

    1. Furman’s an idiot.
    2. Furman says that Clear Channel has set a max price for the Reds’ rights – but there’s no indication that another station in town would pay more.
    3. See point #1.

    ReplyReply
  • 1. Furball is a gossipmonger.
    2. Furball isn’t the brightest bulb on the tree.
    Let’s make sure this rumor doesn’t gain traction, cuz it ain’t gonna happen.

    ReplyReply
  • Oh, and 3. I just wanted to say Furball. It should probably be more like Frizball.

    ReplyReply
  • In addition that Furman was fired by Clear Channel/WLW, so he’s not exactly a non-biased viewpoint.

    ReplyReply
  • GregD

    I didn’t even know the Furball was still in town.

    I’d say ditto to all points made in the comments above.

    ReplyReply
  • Jay

    I’m upset that my local station – which had carried Reds games for decades and decades, dropped it this season. So, I’m ticked about that.

    ReplyReply
  • Mr. Redlegs

    WLW’s signal covers something like 17 states at night in the summer. It would have to be a substantial amount of money for the team to give up that kind of coverage and long-time association with the flagship.

    Anyone thinking the Cardinals wish they had not gotten so greedy for a low-powered signal after about 800 years on KMOX?

    Some would argue that the new stations can make up the coverage by networking out. But like in Jay’s case above, the locals may not want the games any longer or they can make better money on some other programming.

    ReplyReply

You must be logged in to post a comment.